Vigilance vs ReversingLabs
ReversingLabs. Unpacks a release and compares it to an earlier version, then flags new behaviour. It runs as a cloud platform, backed by AI and a huge file database.
Vigilance. Reads any folder on any computer, offline, and says what changed since it last looked.
Side by side
| Question | ReversingLabs | Vigilance |
|---|---|---|
| Finds known bugs | Yes | No |
| Spots a new risky file | Yes | Yes |
| Spots changed behaviour | Yes | Yes |
| Looks inside containers | Yes | Yes |
| Watches live machines | No | Yes |
| Works with no internet | No | Yes |
Where we differ
Both flag a file that gained a new power. ReversingLabs runs in the cloud, so your files go to it. Vigilance runs offline, so nothing leaves the machine. ReversingLabs scores files with AI. Vigilance names the file in plain words, with no AI. Vigilance collects no data about you. ReversingLabs costs five figures a year. Vigilance costs $4 per computer a month, or free.
Known risk versus new risk
A bug or a bad package someone already reported, with a name and a number. Most tools work here.
A file that gained a power it never had, that no report covers yet. Vigilance works here.
Try it on your own software.
Show it the version you run today and the one you are about to install.
Talk to us
A question, a pilot, or a bigger fleet? Send a note. It reaches a person.